|
|
NEWS
RECALLS
COMPLAINT FORM
SCAM ALERTS
RESOURCES
Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws FAQ Newsletters |
Share |
| Automotive Education Employment Electronics Family Finance Health Homeowners Insurance Pets Shopping Travel |
|
|
|
![]() |
Senate, FCC Chairman Spar Over Media ConsolidationLand-grab attitude permeates Washington as elections loom |
|||||||||||||
|
by Martin H.
Bosworth November 9, 2007
Martin has been strongly pushing for the FCC to review its study of media ownership rules and make changes by Dec. 18th, a move which roused criticism from media watchdogs, minority rights groups, and consumer activists. They claim Martin is moving too fast and pushing rules changes to ensure major corporations and businesses could own multiple media outlets in the same region. Cross-outlet ownership in the same region has generally been prohibited by current rules, although there are numerous exceptions. Rupert Murdoch, set to take over The Wall Street Journal, might have to sell The New York Post if the rules aren't relaxed. Although many media monoliths, including Tribune Co., have successfully won exemptions from cross-ownership rules, the big boys would like to have a freer hand. At a rally in Washington, D.C. protesting Martin's move on the media ownership rules, FreePress.net executive director Josh Silver said that “We are gravely concerned that Chairman Martin would try to secretly move on such a critical issue with such a short timetable." “The public is being shut out of the process so that Martin can move forward with his Big Media giveaway," Silver said. Martin's plan led Senators such as Byron Dorgan (D-ND) to call on the Senate Commerce Committee to hold a hearing on the effects of media consolidation in markets and whether or not the plans are taking public wishes into account sufficiently. Cooling-off periodDorgan and Senator Trent Lott (R-MS) co-sponsored a bill that would impose a 90-day period for public comment on any legislation involving media ownership rules, and a separate set of hearings on how media consolidation affects local news coverage, with its own 90-day comment period. The bill, cosponsored by Sens. Barack Obama (D-IL), Olympia Snowe (R-ME), John Kerry (D-MA), Bill Nelson (D-FL), Maria Cantwell (D-WA) and Dianne Feinstein (D-CA, also would require the FCC to establish a panel to investigate female and minority media ownership in the United States and provide accurate statistics that the FCC must consider before acting on any rules changes. "We believe localism and diversity of media ownership is vital in a democracy," Dorgan said. "Our bill recognizes the importance of a wide range of media owners and local content, and requires a process that does not rush past those concerns to open the gates for even more consolidation of media ownership." "Communities count on getting their local news from their locally-owned television stations and weekly and daily newspapers," Lott said. "They know 'locally-owned' means they're invested in their communities and care about their well-being." Land grab?Insiders claim that Martin's rush to institute the new rules is motivated by his political leanings. Martin, a Republican, is said to be concerned that if a Democrat wins the Presidency in the 2008 election, and Democrats pick up more seats in Congress, that the political environment may be even more unfavorable to any legislation that favors corporate consolidation of media outlets. "Thus the land-rush fervor to let big media grab all it can before the new sheriff comes to town," said one longtime Washington operative. "Big business has had the field to itself for the last seven years and there's now a feeling of desperation in the air -- sort of a get-it-before-they-nail-it-down attitude," he said. The Seattle hearing is the last of six Martin convened for public discussion of the proposed changes to media ownership rules. The hearing was announced with only five days' notice, a move that FCC commissioners Jonathan Adelstein and Michael Copps, both Democrats, criticized as "quick and ill-considered" in a joint statement. "A hearing with only five days notice is no nirvana for Seattle and the Pacific Northwest. This smells like mean spirit," the commissoners said, referring to Seattle grunge-rock legends Nirvana. "With such short notice, many people will be shut out. We received notice of the hearing just moments before it was announced. This is outrageous and not how important media policy should be made." Report Your Experience
|
|||||||||||||
Back to the top | |
||||||||||||||
Advertisement
|
|
Custom Search
|
||||
|
AUTOMOTIVE Dealers Manufacturers Service Extended Warranties Lemon Laws Recalls Tires Transporters FAMILY Aging Children, Parenting Recalls Dating Education Entertainment Pets Weddings |
FINANCE Annuities Banks Credit Cards Debt Collection Debt Counseling Insurance Investing Loans Mortgages Payday Loans Student Loans Tax Prep HEALTH Doctors Drugs, Pharmacies Health Clubs Hearing Care Hospitals Nursing Homes Nutrition, Diets Vision Care Weight Loss |
HOUSE & HOME Appliances Cookware Furniture Home Improvements Lawn & Garden Movers Pools & Spas Realtors, Rental Agents Recalls Utilities ELECTRONICS Cable TV/DBS Cameras Cell Phones Computers Home Electronics Internet Access Local Phone Service Long Distance VoIP |
SHOPPING In-Home Online Retail Stores Sporting Goods Supermarkets Telemarketers TRAVEL Airlines Bus Lines Car Rental Cruises Hotels Travel Agents Trains RESOURCES Class Actions Complaint Form Small Claims Guide Lemon Laws |
CONSUMER NEWS Latest News Automotive Telecom Financial Health Homeowners Scams Seniors Travel More ... RECALLS Automotive Children's Products Drugs Food Household Products Sporting Goods ABOUT US FAQ Privacy Policy Advertise With Us Newsroom Syndication Terms of Use |
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2009 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|