CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  


Complain about a product or service

Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish
Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

Crash Tests Predict Fatalities In Cars, Not Trucks

Results similar for both government and privately-funded tests




Advertisement




Cheap Car Insurance
Insurance companies on TV can’t compete with our multi-quote system.
Click here for your quote!

December 12, 2007

NHTSA Crash Tests

Study: Crash Tests Predict Fatalities In Cars, Not Trucks
NHTSA Gives Five Stars to 24 Passenger Vehicles
NHTSA Gives 2006 SUVs High Marks
SUVs Fare Better in New Government Crash Tests
NHTSA Nixes New Crash Tests
NHTSA Plans to Crash Test 77 Models Next Year
GM Trucks Fare Poorly in Crash Tests
Study Confirms 15-Passenger Van Rollover Risk
Suzuki Verona Rates Lowest in Government Crash Test
Side Airbags Help Mitsubishi, Toyota, Volvo Sedans Top Crash Test Ratings
NHTSA Tests Understate Rollover, Side Impact Risks, GAO Finds
Tests Find Vehicles Becoming More Stable
Tire Pressure Monitors Required on 2006 Models
---
IIHS Crash Tests
Auto Safety News

If safety in a crash is your top priority in selecting a new vehicle, government crash tests may help you find a safe car, but not a safe truck. A Virginia Commonwealth University study finds crash tests fail to accurately project driver fatality risks for trucks.

The study examined the frontal crash test ratings that vehicles received from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and compared them to fatality rates in the vehicles. It also compared a smaller sample of test ratings given by the privately-funded Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), which uses a 40-percent frontal offset crash test, with the vehicles’ fatality rates.

The results indicate that the crash tests held by NHTSA and the IIHS are successful in predicting real-world crash outcomes for passenger cars -- the ratings NHTSA and IIHS bestowed on passenger cars generally matched the cars’ safety record on the road.

However, the ratings for trucks did not match real-world outcomes. For example, in the case of both NHTSA and IIHS, trucks that received the worst possible crash-test rating had, on average, lower driver fatality rates than trucks that received the best possible crash-test rating.

“If you’re thinking about buying a passenger car, then the crash test scores can be useful to you,” said study co-author David Harless, professor of economics in the VCU School of Business. “But if you are thinking of buying a truck, we have no evidence that the tests are meaningful in terms of real-world performance in serious crashes.”

The study was published in the September issue of Accident Analysis & Prevention.

Harless and co-author George Hoffer, professor of economics at VCU, limited their research to instances of multiple crash tests in a given vehicle line, controlling for the differences in driver behavior in different lines of vehicles. The study examined the testing of vehicles in the 1987-2001 model years.

IIHS-Auto Safety

Acura TSX Luxury Sedan Top Safety Pick
Nissan Murano Leads SUV Safety Test
Lexus EX35, Cadillac CTS Named Top Safety Picks
Nissan Quest Worst Performer in Minivan Bumper Test
Study: Crash Tests Predict Fatalities In Cars, Not Trucks
Top Safety Awards Go to 34 Cars, SUVs and a Pickup
Midsize SUVs Perform Poorly in Side Impacts
BMW 5 Series Performs Poorly in New Impact Test
Luxury Cars a "Mediocre Lot" in Low-Speed Collisions
Light Trucks Vulnerable to Whiplash
---
More IIHS Tests

IIHS had fewer vehicle lines to review, because it did not begin its testing program until 1995. The study authors urged caution concerning their findings regarding the IIHS tests, particularly for trucks, because of the small sample of vehicle lines they were able to include in their research.

Hoffer said questions have persisted over the years about the value of NHTSA’s frontal crash test ratings because of the difficulty of simulating a real-world crash in a laboratory. A tiny percentage of automobile accidents mirror the circumstances of a direct head-to-head collision between vehicles of similar size – the scenario NHTSA creates in its lab tests.

However, Hoffer said, “it turns out that the government does as good a job as the private sector does at predicting the relative death rate for passenger cars. The tests can be seen as complimentary of each other, though they are quite different.”



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.


Consumer News

July 5 2008

Print, mail, etc.


Recent Recalls & Safety Alerts


FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F

Sign up now!


Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday

Sign up now!


Knowledge is free.
Knowledge is power.



Back to the top |

Advertisement


Home | Rogues Gallery | Good Guys | Complaint Form | News | Recalls | Search | Video | FAQ |
Consumer Resources | Small Claims Guide | Lemon Law | Newsletter | Contact Us
Advertise With Us | Testimonials | Newsroom | RSS Feeds | Radio | Job Postings




Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.