CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  


Complain about a product or service

Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish
Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

Feds Delay Roof Strength Rule Again

Safety advocates say latest proposal is inadequate




Advertisement




Cheap Car Insurance
Insurance companies on TV can’t compete with our multi-quote system.
Click here for your quote!

By Joe Benton
ConsumerAffairs.com

January 25, 2008

Rollovers

Feds Delay New Roof-Crush Rule til October
Report: NHTSA Seeks More Time for Roof-Crush Rule
Senators Seek Delay in New Roof Strength Safety Rules
Senators Question Roof Strength Safety Rules
Nader Protests Feds' Roof Crush Plan
Treacherous Treads Still Taking Lives
Ford Class Action Settlement Leaves Consumers in the Dust
Feds' Roof Crush Rule Inadequate, Critics Charge
New Study: Stronger SUV Roofs Save Lives
Ford Loses $82 Million Rollover Verdict Appeal
Feds Delay Roof Strength Rule Again
Ford Settles Explorer Rollover Lawsuits
Safety Crusaders Seek Action on Roof Crush Injuries
Roof Crush Summit Highlights Safety Shortcomings
Feds Ignore Roof Crush Conference
Feds Delay New Roof Strength Rule
GM to Offer Rollover Airbags, Ford to Strengthen Roofs
Safety Groups Want Earlier Stability Control Rule
---
More about Rollovers ...

Safety regulators at the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) are having a difficult time updating the controversial standard for vehicle roof strength.

The present standard has been on the books since 1971 and a proposed new standard has been repeatedly delayed. Now, NHTSA has asked for yet more information from automakers, safety advocates and the public about the proposed new standards.

The most recent version of the rule under consideration at NHTSA would require both sides of a vehicle roof to support at least two and half times the vehicle's weight. But safety advocates aren't buying it.

"The proposal is still a static test -- one based on mathematical calculations, rather than a dynamic physical test -- and it still is at 2.5 times the weight of the vehicle," said Public Citizen President Joan Claybrook, who headed NHTSA from 1977 through 1981..

The agency has pondered the regulation since the first NHTSA revision of the roof strength rule was panned by both automakers and safety advocates.

The existing standard mandates that just one side support at least one and half of the weight of a vehicle weight. The initial revision of the roof strength rule from NHTSA required support of two and half times vehicle weight but would have continued testing on one side only.

NHTSA Administrator Nicole Nason now says that double-sided testing is a viable alternative approach.

Safety activists have demanded a "dynamic" rollover test which would require rolling a moving vehicle to gather data.

Automakers insist such a test will be costly and accidents involving rollovers include too many variables to design a reliable test.

Each year, nearly 10,000 people die in rollover crashes but government data suggest that only a small percentage of vehicle occupants are killed by collapsing roofs; most are killed because they aren't wearing seat belts, safety regulators say.

Claybrook said it's not that simple.

"The proposal absolutely ignores ejection and containment in the vehicle during rollovers, in which 10,500 people die each year and another 17,000 are seriously injured. To justify a strong rollover protection standard, the agency should address roof crush, ejection and containment as one standard," she said.

Congress most recently directed NHTSA to adopt a new roof standard by April 2009. NHTSA plans to issue a new rollover rule later this year.



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.


Consumer News

July 20 2008

Print, mail, etc.


Recent Recalls & Safety Alerts


FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F

Sign up now!


Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday

Sign up now!


Knowledge is free.
Knowledge is power.



Back to the top |

Advertisement


Home | Rogues Gallery | Good Guys | Complaint Form | News | Recalls | Search | Video | FAQ |
Consumer Resources | Small Claims Guide | Lemon Law | Newsletter | Contact Us
Advertise With Us | Testimonials | Newsroom | RSS Feeds | Radio | Job Postings




Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.