|
|
NEWS
RECALLS
COMPLAINT FORM
SCAM ALERTS
RESOURCES
Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws FAQ Newsletters |
| Automotive Education Employment Electronics Family Finance Health Homeowners Pets Shopping Travel |
|
|
![]() |
ATV Deaths, Injuries ClimbingAfter 20 years, feds no closer to a solution |
|||||
|
By Joseph S. Enoch February 14, 2008
The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) expects the casualty figures to rise as more hospitals and coroners submit data to the agency. In the last year alone, the CPSC added 199 deaths to the 2005 total, raising it to 666. The agency also estimates every year that the figures are much higher than reported. While the 2006 death estimates were not included in the report, the agency estimates 870 people actually died since many deaths are not properly reported. Of the 555 deaths in 2006, 20 percent -- or 111 -- were children younger than 16. Fifty were younger than 12. Aside from deaths, the CPSC estimates that the total number of ATV-related injuries in 2006 is 146,600, the highest total yet and up 10,000 from 2005. While many of the totals are less than recent years, the figures are certain to surpass those numbers as death tolls trickle in, said Rachel Weintraub, Consumer Federation of America's director of product safety. “This further documents that we have a major problem and shows how pervasive the problem is,” Weintraub said. ATVs are one of the deadliest products under the CPSC's jurisdiction, agency spokesman Scott Wolfson said. “Although the methodologies for gathering data on bikes and ATVs are different, those are two products that are among the deadliest,” Wolfson said. The deadliest product of all? Stairs. 20 yearsThe agency has been working on proposed rules to make ATVs safer for more than 20 years and although it reached a consent decree in the '80s to ban the sale of the exponentially deadlier three-wheel models, little progress has been made. In an interview last month, agency spokeswoman Julie Vallese said the agency hopes to make some progress on the proposed rules this summer. Currently the agency cannot act on any new regulations because it does not have a quorum of three commissioners. The proposed rules mostly solidify many of the current voluntary standards and Weintraub said those rules are not now keeping riders safe and will not do so in the future. In August 2006, the CPSC denied a petition filed over six years ago by consumer and health groups demanding action on ATVs. A statement from the Specialty Vehicle Institute of America (SVIA), the ATV industry's lobbying arm, places blame for the accidents on rider error. “The vast majority of ATV-related accidents and fatalities involve behaviors that the ATV industry warns against in its rider education programs, in all its literature, and on vehicle labels,” according to an SVIA statement. “In fact, an analysis of ATV fatalities during 1997-2002 showed that 92 percent of the fatalities were associated with one or more of these warned against behaviors.” But Weintraub said the industry response is inadequate. “Unfortunately, instead of working to keep children off adult-size ATVs and creating meaningful standards to decrease ATV hazards, the ATV industry has been prioritizing the protection of their economic interest and seeking to shift the blame from their vehicles to the riders.” Wolfson said many ATV-related deaths and injuries could be avoided if riders follow these rules:
“Parents control the key: from purchase, to training, to operation,” according to the SVIA statement. “Youth under the age of 16 must not operate adult-sized ATVs and parents need to fulfill their responsibility as guardians of their children by purchasing the right ATV for them, by not allowing their children to operate adult-sized ATVs, by taking advantage of the free rider training courses made available by the member companies of the SVIA, and by supervising their children at all times.” The American Association of Pediatrics suggests that no children under 16 ride ATVs regardless of the model. Report Your Experience
|
|
||||
Advertisement
|
|
Custom Search
|
||||
|
AUTOMOTIVE Dealers Manufacturers Service Extended Warranties Lemon Laws Recalls Tires Transporters FAMILY Aging Children, Parenting Recalls Dating Education Entertainment Pets Weddings |
FINANCE Annuities Banks Credit Cards Debt Collection Debt Counseling Insurance Investing Loans Mortgages Payday Loans Student Loans Tax Prep HEALTH Doctors Drugs, Pharmacies Health Clubs Hearing Care Hospitals Nursing Homes Nutrition, Diets Vision Care Weight Loss |
HOMEOWNERS & RENTERS Appliances Cookware Furniture Home Improvements Lawn & Garden Movers Pools & Spas Realtors, Rental Agents Recalls Utilities ELECTRONICS Cable TV/DBS Cameras Cell Phones Computers Home Electronics Internet Access Local Phone Service Long Distance VoIP |
SHOPPING In-Home Online Retail Stores Sporting Goods Supermarkets Telemarketers TRAVEL Airlines Bus Lines Car Rental Cruises Hotels Travel Agents Trains RESOURCES Class Actions Complaint Form Small Claims Guide Lemon Laws |
CONSUMER NEWS Latest News Automotive Telecom Financial Health Homeowners Scams Seniors Travel More ... RECALLS Automotive Children's Products Drugs Food Household Products Sporting Goods ABOUT US FAQ Privacy Policy Advertise With Us Newsroom Syndication Terms of Use |
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2009 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|