|
|
CONSUMER NEWS
RECALLS
COMPLAINT FORM
SCAM ALERTS
Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws FAQ Newsletters Spanish |
|
|
![]() |
OnStar Owners Bristle at Loss of ServiceAnalog version of the popular service now officially defunct |
|||||
|
By Joe Benton February 19, 2008
GM's analog customers who are now without the safety and convenience service are angry. Julie in Austin, Texas said she discovered her OnStar service disappeared while on a recent trip. “I've since found out that it can't be upgraded, repaired, modified, adapted or anything else. Now I have a rear view mirror with buttons that continually remind me I have a broken part in my car that GM refuses to repair.” Cellular telephone companies are no longer required to provide the analog service the older OnStar systems employ. This is the latest step in the transition from analog to digital communications sanctioned by the Federal Communications Commission. If your car or truck is a 2002 model or older with an analog-only OnStar system you have probably already figured out the system is kaput. Now the analog-only systems are officially useless unless the consumer was able to purchase a system that GM could upgrade to a digital connection and the consumer paid for the upgrade. Cege in Dallas is one of those OnStar customers who are out of luck with a useless system: “My OnStar doesn't work but my car still does,” she wrote. General Motors made digital upgrade kits available to consumers who had active OnStar subscriptions. Roughly 90 percent of the GM analog OnStar systems were capable of being upgraded to a digital connection. Cege said she was not offered the upgrade. A Manassas, Virginia OnStar user bought an OnStar-equipped 2002 Chevy Silverado in 2003. “I have found out from GM themselves that GM knew in November 2002 of the OnStar problem but did not change the OnStar analog model to analog/digital until 2003 models,” he said. “They did not choose to inform 2003 customers of the problem with 2002 models even after they knew the problem existed.” The Silverado owner thinks G M “should be forced to design an upgrade for the analog model for the 2002 truck or each owner of this truck should be compensated for the entire cost of the OnStar model and damages should be awarded to each truck owner for false advertisement." Report Your Experience
|
|||||
Back to the top | |
||||||
Advertisement
|
|
||||
|
AUTOMOTIVE Dealers Manufacturers Service Extended Warranties Lemon Laws Recalls Tires Transporters FAMILY Aging Children, Parenting Recalls Dating Education Entertainment Pets Weddings |
FINANCE Annuities Banks Credit Cards Debt Collection Debt Counseling Insurance Investing Loans Mortgages Payday Loans Student Loans Tax Prep HEALTH Drugs, Pharmacies Health Clubs Hearing Care Hospitals Nursing Homes Nutrition, Diets Vision Care Weight Loss |
HOMEOWNERS & RENTERS Appliances Cookware Furniture Home Improvements Lawn & Garden Movers Pools & Spas Realtors, Rental Agents Recalls Utilities ELECTRONICS Cable TV/DBS Cameras Cell Phones Computers Home Electronics Internet Access Local Phone Service Long Distance VoIP |
SHOPPING In-Home Online Retail Stores Supermarkets Telemarketers TRAVEL Airlines Bus Lines Car Rental Cruises Hotels Travel Agents Trains RESOURCES Class Actions Complaint Form Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws |
CONSUMER NEWS Latest News Automotive Telecom Financial Health Homeowners Scams Seniors Travel More ... RECALLS Automotive Children's Products Drugs Food Household Products Sporting Goods ABOUT US FAQ Privacy Policy Advertise With Us Newsroom Syndication Terms of Use |
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|