|
CONSUMER NEWS RECALLS COMPLAINT FORM SCAM ALERTS |
| Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish | |
|
|
![]() |
Many Pet Foods Still Missing From Store ShelvesSales remain sluggish after last year's pet poisonings |
|||||
|
By D.O. Volente March 25, 2008
About 20% of recalled products, mostly wet foods, have yet to return, and 10% of recalled products have been discontinued, says PetSmart,the nation's No. 1 pet-food chain in an article in the daily newspaper. The paper quotes Dave Bolen, chief merchandising officer at Petco, as saying that while sales of dry food grow, sales of wet are still off about 25% from pre-recall levels. Menu Foods, a contract manufacturer that made most of the recalled products, launched the recall a year ago after cats and dogs were sickened or died after eating food containing contaminated ingredients imported from China. The recall affected hundreds of products, including high- and low-end brands. It was the first recall in a series involving imported products that focused attention on the safety of the U.S. food supply and how vigorously U.S. companies check suppliers, especially those from China. Pet-food makers of all sizes say they've since tightened safeguards. No. 1 Nestlé Purina PetCare, for instance, no longer imports Chinese wheat gluten, the tainted ingredient in many of the recalled foods. Like many, it also tests wheat gluten for the industrial chemical melamine, which sickened the animals. Melamine was added to wheat flour in China to make it appear to be the more valuable wheat gluten or rice protein concentrate, according to USA Today. "We still have some work to do to win back some of the sales from the pet-food recall," PetSmart CEO Philip Francis told industry analysts this month. IndictmentsLast month, two Chinese companies -- and an American importer and its owners -- were indicted for their alleged roles in intentionally manufacturing and distributing melamine-tainted wheat gluten that was used to make dog and cat food. "When I first read about these (indictments), I was crying because I was so happy," said pet owner Carol V. of Rhode Island, whose two cats became gravely ill last February after eating melamine-tainted pet food. "It was one year ago yesterday that my nightmare started. It made me feel really good that something was being done. I was shocked because I had not idea that these criminal investigations were going on. I thought they had fizzled," she said. But Carol and other pet owners are adamant that the investigation into last year's pet food recall -- the largest in U.S. history -- must continue. They say more companies should be held accountable for their roles in the deaths and illnesses of pets nationwide. "I don't think the American company that imported the wheat gluten should be alone in this investigation," Carol said. Report Your Experience
|
|
||||
Advertisement
|
Home |
Rogues Gallery |
Good Guys |
Complaint Form |
News |
Recalls |
Search |
Video |
FAQ |
|
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. |