CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  


Complain about a product or service

Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish
Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

American Cancels More Fights For Safety Checks

Airline pulls more MD-80s to check wiring bundles



By Mark Huffman
ConsumerAffairs.com

April 9, 2008

Airline Safety
Airline Safety
American Cancels More Fights For Safety Checks
Key Lawmaker Wants FAA 'Housecleaning'
FAA To Review All Airline Maintenance Procedures
Southwest Grounds 41 Airplanes, Suspends Three Workers
Problems Found With Wing Bolts On Four U.S. Planes
TSA Adds Security Checks for Airport Employees
FAA Says Many U.S. Airports Short On Safety
New Device Finds Illegal Cellphones on Airplanes
Laptop Fires Worry Airline Safety Regulators
New System Reduces Risk of Runway Collision
Study Warns Cell Phones Could Cause Airliner Crash
Inspector General Hits Outsourced Airline Maintenance
Air Controllers Cite Close Calls In Los Angeles
Air Controllers Warn Equipment Glitch Affects Safety
Report Questions Airline Safety
Cell Phones on Planes - Survey Warns of Air Rage
Air Travel Still Risky, Pilots Warn
Airlines Outsourcing More Maintenance
Pilots Blast Airport Security

The number of canceled American Airlines flights continued to grow Wednesday, as the airline pulled in its fleet of MD-80 aircraft for Federal Aviation Administration airworthiness inspections. By midday Wednesday the number of canceled American flights had risen above 800.

The inspections are focusing on the bundling of wires in the aircraft's wheel wells. The airline said the inspections – based on FAA audits – are related to detailed, technical compliance issues and not safety-of-flight issues.

"We've been working in good faith to ensure that we are in complete compliance with this airworthiness directive," said Gerard Arpey, Chairman and CEO of American Airlines. "We regret and apologize that we are once again causing inconvenience to our customers, but we will continue to work in good faith until we satisfy all of the technical issues related to this airworthiness directive."

American said it will re-accommodate customers on other American flights or on flights operated by airlines in the same market. Customers may be automatically notified of flight changes; they should also check AA.com or with their travel agents for flight status.

The FAA raised additional concerns regarding the recent inspection of American's aircraft and the manner in which American followed the engineering change order (ECO) that had been written for the airworthiness directive related to the wiring in the MD-80s wheel wells.

Specifically, some areas of concern included the spacing of the ties on the wiring bundle and the direction in which the retention clips and lacing cords were facing.

American said it has assigned teams of employees that include aviation maintenance technicians, quality assurance inspectors, and engineers to inspect the aircraft and ensure full compliance, as well as to make the necessary adjustments.

Any aircraft that does not completely comply with the detailed technical specifications of installation will be removed from service until all specifications have been met, company executives said. Aircraft will return to service as they have been inspected and all necessary work completed.

American is just the latest airline to react to the FAA's new emphasis on inspections, in the wake of heavy criticism of the agency's monitoring and enforcement of inspection mandates.

Southwest Airlines faces a possible $10 million fine after it few a number of its Boeing 737 jets that had not been inspected for cracks in their fuselage, as ordered.

Congressional reaction

Last month's revelation that Southwest Airlines was continuing to fly uninspected planes is continuing to reverberate through Congress.

Attention has shifted from Southwest and other airlines to the agency responsible for overseeing airline safety – the Federal Aviation Administration.

Now, Rep. James Oberstar (D-MN), chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, wants the FAA to "clean house from top to bottom," to make the agency more vigilant in carrying out its proper mission.

For starters, Oberstar wants to close the "revolving door" that he says results in FAA inspectors leaving government service to take cushy airline jobs. He says he'll draft legislation to require inspectors to wait a specified period before they can work in the industry they once regulated.

Outsourcing

Meanwhile, the Wall Street Journal reports that Southwest, which faces a potential $10 million fine over the inspection violations, has cancelled plans to outsource aircraft maintenance to a company in El Salvador.

"We've been trying for years to get the FAA to pay attention to how dangerous it is to outsource maintenance overseas," said Teamsters Union President Jim Hoffa, whose members perform maintenance work in the U.S. "Our mechanics keep telling us how they often have to re-do work that was done wrong by airlines' outside vendors."

"Airline mechanics have to meet much higher standards in America than they do overseas," Hoffa said. "Mechanics in foreign shops don't even have to be FAA-certificated."

Hoffa said that between 1997 and 2006, U.S. airlines increased their outsourced maintenance expenses from 37 percent to 64 percent," Hoffa said.

In advance of Oberstar's Capitol Hill hearings on the subject, FAA Acting Administrator Robert Sturgell said the agency would institute a two-year ban on former FAA inspectors going to work for airlines in important maintenance jobs.

FAA whistle blowers have increasingly complained that FAA inspectors failed to act on repeated warnings about Southwest's inspection lapses, allowing the airline to "voluntarily" report missed deadlines, thus avoiding penalties.

Southwest faces a possible $10.2 million fine after the FAA cited the discount carrier for failing to inspect some of their planes for structural cracks. Specifically, the FAA maintains that the airline continued to use planes after it missed a mandatory deadline to have them inspected.

The inspections were ordered to look for structural cracks in the fuselage of the Boeing 737 aircraft Southwest uses.

Southwest initially said the missed inspections were an oversight, and after discovering the error, quickly re-inspected all the aircraft for cracks. It says the inspections were mostly routine and redundant and that flight safety was never compromised.

The FAA-mandated inspections are designed to find tiny cracks in an aircraft's fuselage before they can get bigger and compromise the structural integrity of the plane. Since a modern jetliner may be used for 30 years or more, these inspections are supposed to find the kinds of problems than can occur as an aircraft ages.

See Airlines Outsourcing More Maintenance.



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.


Consumer News

May 12 2008

Recent Recalls & Safety Alerts

READER SERVICES

Print, Email & More

Subscribe

Free consumer newsletters
Sign up now!





More consumer videos ...

Back to the top |


Home | Rogues Gallery | Good Guys | Complaint Form | News | Recalls | Search | Site Map | FAQ |
Consumer Resources | Small Claims Guide | Lemon Law | Newsletter | Contact Us
Advertise With Us | Testimonials | Newsroom | RSS Feeds | Video | Job Postings

Advertisement


Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.