|
CONSUMER NEWS RECALLS COMPLAINT FORM SCAM ALERTS |
| Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish | |
|
|
![]() |
Medical Class Actions: Condition Critical?'Mass tort' cases can help patients but courts not always receptive |
||||||
|
By Joan E. Lisante May 17, 2008
Two years later, you feel okay, but start hearing about other patients with the same artificial valve who’ve experienced blood clots and even strokes. You may feel as though there’s a ticking time bomb in your chest, but you’re hard pressed to show damage. Do you have a case against the valve’s manufacturer? Eleven thousand cardiac patients think so. All received a silver-coated “Silzone” prosthetic heart valve manufactured by St. Jude Medical, Inc, based in St. Paul, Minnesota. These valves were designed to be protective, since the silver was thought to help fight infection in cardiac tissue, which often accompanies heart-valve implants. However, it turns out that Silzone valves were prone to leak and put patients at higher risk of thrombus (blood clot) formation and stroke. The valve, first introduced in 1997, was recalled in early 2000. Valve recipients filed a class action in Minnesota, alleging that St. Jude violated several consumer protection statutes by misrepresenting facts and hiding information about how unsafe the device was. The federal District Court certified a nationwide class, ruling that although plaintiffs were from various states, all could file using Minnesota’s consumer protection statutes. Set adriftFor those still symptom-free, patients asked that a medical monitoring program be set up to screen them for indications of a defective heart valve. Last month, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the District Court’s certification, setting plaintiffs adrift. The Court listed several reasons for throwing out (decertifying) the class:
Likewise, said the Court, a medical monitoring class is inappropriate when so many individual issues are involved. These facts show the trickiness of getting any medical class action certified without being decertified later. Mass tortThe St. Jude case is an example of a “mass tort.” Mass tort cases originate when a large number of claims are associated with one product, and plaintiffs have common factual and legal issues. When causes or degrees of individual injuries vary widely, courts are reluctant to jam them together into one class. Consumers can see other cases mirrored in the St. Jude situation, whether involving implants, contraceptives, diet pills or replacement knees. Because of the extreme expense of proving that a defective product caused your injury and getting medical experts to attest to that, the appeal of joining a medical class action is clear. But as the St. Jude case shows, the courts are not always receptive. If you find yourself in such a situation, what to do? Here are some tips:
Joan E. Lisante is an attorney who writes frequently on consumer issues. Report Your Experience
|
|
|||||
Advertisement
|
Home |
Rogues Gallery |
Good Guys |
Complaint Form |
News |
Recalls |
Search |
Video |
FAQ |
|
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. |