CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  


Complain about a product or service

Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish
Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

Medical Class Actions: Condition Critical?

'Mass tort' cases can help patients but courts not always receptive





By Joan E. Lisante
ConsumerAffairs.com

May 17, 2008

Class Actions
Consumer Class ActionsAll About Class Actions: Plaintiff Power Not Dead Yet
Web Surfers Seek Justice Online
---
Class Action News

Let's say you’re a cardiac patient and your doctor suggests that your arrhythmia can be stopped by replacing a heart valve. So, along with 11,000 other Americans, you have the device implanted and think the problem’s fixed.

Two years later, you feel okay, but start hearing about other patients with the same artificial valve who’ve experienced blood clots and even strokes. You may feel as though there’s a ticking time bomb in your chest, but you’re hard pressed to show damage. Do you have a case against the valve’s manufacturer?

Eleven thousand cardiac patients think so.

All received a silver-coated “Silzone” prosthetic heart valve manufactured by St. Jude Medical, Inc, based in St. Paul, Minnesota.

These valves were designed to be protective, since the silver was thought to help fight infection in cardiac tissue, which often accompanies heart-valve implants. However, it turns out that Silzone valves were prone to leak and put patients at higher risk of thrombus (blood clot) formation and stroke.

The valve, first introduced in 1997, was recalled in early 2000.

Valve recipients filed a class action in Minnesota, alleging that St. Jude violated several consumer protection statutes by misrepresenting facts and hiding information about how unsafe the device was. The federal District Court certified a nationwide class, ruling that although plaintiffs were from various states, all could file using Minnesota’s consumer protection statutes.

Set adrift

For those still symptom-free, patients asked that a medical monitoring program be set up to screen them for indications of a defective heart valve.

Last month, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the District Court’s certification, setting plaintiffs adrift. The Court listed several reasons for throwing out (decertifying) the class:

1) St. Jude didn’t get a chance to show that specific patients had not relied on misrepresentations regarding the valves;

2) St. Jude had the right to review each plaintiff’s charges that the valve caused their injury or illness;

3) class certification is inappropriate when each case relies on many personal facts with respect to medical treatment and history.

Likewise, said the Court, a medical monitoring class is inappropriate when so many individual issues are involved.

These facts show the trickiness of getting any medical class action certified without being decertified later.

Mass tort

The St. Jude case is an example of a “mass tort.” Mass tort cases originate when a large number of claims are associated with one product, and plaintiffs have common factual and legal issues.

When causes or degrees of individual injuries vary widely, courts are reluctant to jam them together into one class.

Consumers can see other cases mirrored in the St. Jude situation, whether involving implants, contraceptives, diet pills or replacement knees. Because of the extreme expense of proving that a defective product caused your injury and getting medical experts to attest to that, the appeal of joining a medical class action is clear. But as the St. Jude case shows, the courts are not always receptive.

If you find yourself in such a situation, what to do?

Here are some tips:

Make sure your case meets crucial criteria for class action consideration. Broadly speaking, there must be: a substantial number of people similarly harmed; common questions of law or fact; plaintiffs who seek similar relief from the court, whether monetary damages of replacement of a defective product; and competent legal representation for the whole class.

Check the Web If your claim relates to a specific product or service, you can check the Web for the latest developments or to see if any class actions have been filed. Many Web sites offer such information, including www.classactionconnect.com, www.classactionlitigation.com, www.lawyersandsettlements.com, and www.medicalnewstoday.com.

Pick the right lawyer Class action litigation is specialized and any lawyer taking such a case should have adequate experience prosecuting class actions as well as knowledge of the subject area. There are a number of options for finding competent counsel, including the American Bar Association listings found at www.abanet.org/legalservices, www.findlaw.com, and www.lawinfo.com/attorney/class-action.

---

Joan E. Lisante is an attorney who writes frequently on consumer issues.



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.


Consumer News

July 6 2008

Recent Recalls & Safety Alerts

Print, mail, etc.




FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F

Sign up now!


Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday

Sign up now!


Knowledge is free.
Knowledge is power.



Back to the top |

Advertisement


Home | Rogues Gallery | Good Guys | Complaint Form | News | Recalls | Search | Video | FAQ |
Consumer Resources | Small Claims Guide | Lemon Law | Newsletter | Contact Us
Advertise With Us | Testimonials | Newsroom | RSS Feeds | Radio | Job Postings




Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.