NEWS   RECALLS   COMPLAINT FORM   SCAM ALERTS   RESOURCES
Small Claims Guide   Class Actions   Lemon Laws   FAQ   Newsletters  
Bookmark and Share


Complain about a product or service

Automotive   Education   Employment   Electronics   Family   Finance   Health    Homeowners   Insurance   Pets   Shopping   Travel    Print This     Email This  



NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

Mattel Agrees to Lower Lead Paint Levels in Toys

Toymaker settles with 39 Attorneys General, agrees to stricter standards





By Mark Huffman and Lisa Wade McCormick
ConsumerAffairs.com

December 15, 2008


Toy Importer to Pay Penalty for Violating Lead Paint Ban
CPSC Outlines Revamped Crib Recall Policy
Mississippi Warns Residents on Unsafe Toys
CPSC Delays Enforcement Of Testing on Kids' Products
Popular Zhu Zhu Pet May Contain Dangerous Chemicals
Report: Fewer Toys Contain Lead but Toxins Still Common
California Warns Retailers On Lead
Mattel Settles Suits Over Dangerous Toys
Target To Pay $600,000 For Violating Lead Paint Ban
Tougher Safety Requirements For Children's Products Now In Effect
Toys 'R' Us Launches Unsafe Baby Products Awareness Program
New Safety Agency Chief Pledges Greater Openness
Obama Names New Consumer Product Safety Chair, Boosts Budget
Toymaker Fined $1.1 Million For Consumer Violations
Maryland Stores Stop Selling Toys With Lead Paint
Toymakers, Craftspeople Up In Arms Over New Safety Law
Thrift Stores Protest Ban on Lead Toys
Target Launches In-Store Recall System
Do's and Don'ts of Holiday Decorating
New Jersey Finds Recalled Toys in Four Stores
Mattel Agrees to Lower Lead Paint Levels in Toys
Consumers Cautioned About Dangerous Toys
Soon-To-Be-Banned Plastic Toys Flooding the Market
Safety Agency Warns of Safety Hazards in Cribs
---
More Consumer Safety News
Recall Notices

Thirty-nine Attorneys General today announced an agreement with Mattel, Inc. and Fisher Price, Inc. that will immediately reduce the lead content in children's toys. Under the agreement, the toy manufacturers will comply with future federally-mandated lead limit reductions ahead of schedule.

The settlement resolves a 15-month investigation of the company's Fisher-Price subsidiary. The consent judgment requires Mattel to make a payment of $12 million by January 30, 2009, to be divided among the participating states.

The agreement reached by the attorneys general and Mattel includes more stringent standards for accessible lead, in both surface coatings and substrates, effective for toys manufactured after November 30, 2008.

Under the settlement, the new standards are 90 ppm (parts per million) for lead paint and surface coatings, and 300 ppm total lead for substrates. A substrate is the base substance a toy is made of that is distinct from the surface coating that covers a toy.

The agreement also mandates that Mattel keep records indicating each toy's manufacturer, manufacturing location, and the results of lead tests done on those products, and to "proactively inform" the state attorneys general if their tests reveal the toys contain excessive lead under the new standards.

"Today's agreement protects young Texans by helping to ensure that popular children's toys do not contain excessive, unlawful amounts of lead," said Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott said. "Exposure to excessive levels of lead can cause serious health problems, particularly among children. The agreement reached today requires two of the nation's most popular toy manufacturers to strictly comply with federal regulations that limit lead in toys."

"Lead is highly toxic, particularly to young children. Higher exposures to lead, such as the levels found in these toys, can cause grave health problems," said Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley. "This agreement also includes important lead monitoring requirements that should prevent a similar public health scare from occurring in the future, in addition to funds that will be used for preventative efforts on the state level."

The agreement comes on the heels of last year's recalls of thousands of toys that contained excessive amounts of lead. Mattel and Fisher-Price recalled the toys because the lead in the surface paints exceeded 600 ppm, which is the maximum amount allowed under federal law.

From August 2, 2007, through October 25, 2007, the United States Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) recalled approximately two million Mattel and Fisher-Price toys, all manufactured by contractors in China, because the toys contained excessive lead in accessible surface coatings and substrates.

During the course of the states' investigation, authorities found that lead levels in the recalled toys not only exceeded the federal standard, but in some instances, tested over 10,000 ppm and 50,000 ppm. The attorneys general investigated how Mattel permitted these lead-tainted toys to enter the stream of commerce and whether Mattel's contracting and quality assurance processes were sufficient to guard against lead-tainted toys.

Since the attorneys general first contacted Mattel in August 2007, Congress enacted the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act ("CPSIA"), which requires more stringent standards for lead in surface coatings and substrates, effective in February 2009. Under the judgment, Mattel must phase-in more stringent standards ahead of the timelines provided by the CPSIA.

Health experts say small amounts of lead can impair brain development in children younger than 12 and high lead levels can cause serious health problems, including seizures, comas or death.



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.

FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F

Sign up now!


Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday

Sign up now!

Follow us on Twitter.





CONSUMER NEWS

SAFETY RECALLS

Back to the top |

Advertisement


Custom Search
AUTOMOTIVE
• Dealers
• Manufacturers
• Service
• Extended Warranties
• Lemon Laws
• Recalls
• Tires
• Transporters

FAMILY
• Aging
• Children, Parenting
• Recalls
• Dating
• Education
• Entertainment
• Pets
• Weddings
FINANCE
• Annuities
• Banks
• Credit Cards
• Debt Collection
• Debt Counseling
• Insurance
• Investing
• Loans
• Mortgages
• Payday Loans
• Student Loans
• Tax Prep

HEALTH
• Doctors
• Drugs, Pharmacies
• Health Clubs
• Hearing Care
• Hospitals
• Nursing Homes
• Nutrition, Diets
• Vision Care
• Weight Loss
HOUSE & HOME
• Appliances
• Cookware
• Furniture
• Home Improvements
• Lawn & Garden
• Movers
• Pools & Spas
• Realtors, Rental Agents
• Recalls
• Utilities

ELECTRONICS
• Cable TV/DBS
• Cameras
• Cell Phones
• Computers
• Home Electronics
• Internet Access
• Local Phone Service
• Long Distance
• VoIP
SHOPPING
• Delivery Services
• In-Home
• Online
• Retail Stores
• Sporting Goods
• Supermarkets
• Telemarketers

TRAVEL
• Airlines
• Bus Lines
• Car Rental
• Cruises
• Hotels
• Travel Agents
• Trains

RESOURCES
• Class Actions
• Complaint Form
• Small Claims Guide
• Lemon Laws
CONSUMER NEWS
• Latest News
• Automotive
• Telecom
• Financial
• Health
• Homeowners
• Scams
• Seniors
• Travel
• More ...

RECALLS
• Automotive
• Children's Products
• Drugs
• Food
• Household Products
• Sporting Goods

ABOUT US
• FAQ
• Privacy Policy
• Advertise With Us
• Newsroom
• Syndication
• Terms of Use

Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2010 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.    The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission.