|
|
NEWS
RECALLS
COMPLAINT FORM
SCAM ALERTS
RESOURCES
Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws FAQ Newsletters |
Share |
| Automotive Education Employment Electronics Family Finance Health Homeowners Insurance Pets Shopping Travel |
|
|
|
![]() |
Bankruptcy Not Helping People Keep Their HomesNew study finds even Chapter 13 doesn't stave off foreclosure |
|||||||||||||
|
May 25, 2009
University of Iowa law professor and bankruptcy researcher Katie Porter says few Americans who struggle with high housing costs will be able to save their homes by filing for bankruptcy because of limitations in federal bankruptcy law. In fact, Porter said the fate of many homeowners is "grim" because most don't earn enough income to make the monthly payment on their mortgages. More than 70 percent of homeowners who filed Chapter 13 bankruptcy in Porter's study live in unaffordable homes, which means that even if they stave off foreclosure for now, most still won't be able to afford their monthly payment in the future. "Chapter 13 is a powerful tool for helping families get caught up on missed payments of their home loan, but does nothing to address the future affordability of their mortgage," said Porter. "As a result, without a significant increase in income, many of these homeowners will have a difficult time finding the dollars to pay their mortgages. This jeopardizes their chances of completing their bankruptcy and exposes them to a high likelihood of foreclosure." Porter's study examined 1,733 Chapter 13 bankruptcy filings by homeowners in April 2006. The research showed that 50 percent of them live in homes that meet federal guidelines as unaffordable, which means they consume between 30 percent and 50 percent of a household's monthly income. An additional 21 percent of filers live in homes defined as severely unaffordable, which means they consume more than 50 percent of the household's monthly income. The Obama Administration recently identified 31 percent of gross pay devoted to housing as the appropriate benchmark for modifying mortgages. But Porter said that even when using gross income, only half of all homeowners in bankruptcy have homeownership costs below the 31 percent threshold. Only 28 percent of the filers live in homes that meet federal guidelines for affordable housing, she said. Complicating the issue is the fact that most of those who file for bankruptcy protection have low incomes. In Porter's survey, the median annual income of a bankrupt family was $43,000, well below the $65,000 national average. "Chapter 13's requirement of living on a strict budget for three to five years will pose a formidable challenge to families in unaffordable or severely unaffordable housing," Porter said. "Without the ability to modify the terms of their mortgages, an option available in bankruptcy for other kinds of secured debt, many families will lose their homes to foreclosure despite bankruptcy." The implications extend beyond the debtor losing a home, however. She said it increases the likelihood of a homeowner re-filing for bankruptcy, driving up the number of cases in an already clogged legal system. Porter said some of these homeowners might be able to pay their future mortgages if the bankruptcy court were able to set up a new payment schedule between the homeowner and the lender, a process known as "cram down." But an anti-modification rule in federal bankruptcy law prohibits such action in almost all cases. "Bankruptcy law does not permit debtors to modify the terms of mortgages, and this limitation on restructuring the loan may pose an insurmountable barrier to families who are trapped in unaffordable loans," she said. Porter said Congress should re-write bankruptcy laws to permit the modification of mortgages in bankruptcy to help families save their homes from foreclosure. She notes that her study's sample consists of bankruptcy cases filed in 2006, before the recent explosion of foreclosures. Since many of today's foreclosures are being brought on by the widespread use of such non-traditional credit vehicles as sub-prime loans, and the loose underwriting standards used to approve many of those loans, she speculates that families are actually having an even more difficult time staying in their homes than her study documents. Report Your Experience
|
|||||||||||||
Back to the top | |
||||||||||||||
Advertisement
|
|
Custom Search
|
||||
|
AUTOMOTIVE Dealers Manufacturers Service Extended Warranties Lemon Laws Recalls Tires Transporters FAMILY Aging Children, Parenting Recalls Dating Education Entertainment Pets Weddings |
FINANCE Annuities Banks Credit Cards Debt Collection Debt Counseling Insurance Investing Loans Mortgages Payday Loans Student Loans Tax Prep HEALTH Doctors Drugs, Pharmacies Health Clubs Hearing Care Hospitals Nursing Homes Nutrition, Diets Vision Care Weight Loss |
HOUSE & HOME Appliances Cookware Furniture Home Improvements Lawn & Garden Movers Pools & Spas Realtors, Rental Agents Recalls Utilities ELECTRONICS Cable TV/DBS Cameras Cell Phones Computers Home Electronics Internet Access Local Phone Service Long Distance VoIP |
SHOPPING In-Home Online Retail Stores Sporting Goods Supermarkets Telemarketers TRAVEL Airlines Bus Lines Car Rental Cruises Hotels Travel Agents Trains RESOURCES Class Actions Complaint Form Small Claims Guide Lemon Laws |
CONSUMER NEWS Latest News Automotive Telecom Financial Health Homeowners Scams Seniors Travel More ... RECALLS Automotive Children's Products Drugs Food Household Products Sporting Goods ABOUT US FAQ Privacy Policy Advertise With Us Newsroom Syndication Terms of Use |
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2009 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|