|
|
NEWS
RECALLS
COMPLAINT FORM
SCAM ALERTS
RESOURCES
Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws FAQ Newsletters |
Share |
| Automotive Education Employment Electronics Family Finance Health Homeowners Insurance Pets Shopping Travel |
|
|
|
![]() |
Verizon Wireless Revamps "Exclusive" Handset DealsWill offer smaller carriers more high-profile handsets |
|||||||||||||
|
by Martin H.
Bosworth July 18, 2009
"Effective immediately for small wireless carriers (those with 500,000 customers or less), any new exclusivity arrangement we enter with handset makers will last no longer than six months--for all manufacturers and all devices," said Verizon CEO Lowell McAdam in a letter to Congressman Rick Boucher (D-VA), chairman of the House Subcommittee on Telecommunications and the Internet. "Exclusivity arrangements promote competition and innovation in device development and design," McAdam said. "We work closely with our vendors to develop new and exciting devices that will attract customers." The move is largely interpreted as symbolic, given that four major carriers--Verizon Wireless, AT&T, Sprint, and T-Mobile, all with millions of customers--control over 90 percent of the U.S. wireless customer market. Consumer advocates were unimpressed with McAdam's policy announcement. "Verizon's new terms for exclusive handset deals do not go far enough to create meaningful consumer choice and competition," said Chris Riley, policy counsel for Free Press. "Why is the limit six months, and why is it limited only to the smallest carriers and not any of Verizon's major competitors? This proposal does nothing to address the anti-competitive issues posed by handset exclusivity deals." Under the typical exclusive wireless contract, a customer pays much less for a phone, but also has to sign up for a year-long or two-year contract. Wireless carriers say the contracts enable the phones to be sold at heavily subsidized prices, enabling them to recoup their investment in selling them. Critics charge that exclusive contracts hamper innovation by denying customers the right to take their phones and use them with any carrier, and grant the carrier control over what can and cannot be used with the phone. Concerns about exclusive wireless contracts increased after fans of the popular Apple iPhone vented their discontent with AT&T--the exclusive carrier of the phone--over its pricing plans, service, and support. Report Your Experience
|
|||||||||||||
Back to the top | |
||||||||||||||
Advertisement
|
|
Custom Search
|
||||
|
AUTOMOTIVE Dealers Manufacturers Service Extended Warranties Lemon Laws Recalls Tires Transporters FAMILY Aging Children, Parenting Recalls Dating Education Entertainment Pets Weddings |
FINANCE Annuities Banks Credit Cards Debt Collection Debt Counseling Insurance Investing Loans Mortgages Payday Loans Student Loans Tax Prep HEALTH Doctors Drugs, Pharmacies Health Clubs Hearing Care Hospitals Nursing Homes Nutrition, Diets Vision Care Weight Loss |
HOUSE & HOME Appliances Cookware Furniture Home Improvements Lawn & Garden Movers Pools & Spas Realtors, Rental Agents Recalls Utilities ELECTRONICS Cable TV/DBS Cameras Cell Phones Computers Home Electronics Internet Access Local Phone Service Long Distance VoIP |
SHOPPING In-Home Online Retail Stores Sporting Goods Supermarkets Telemarketers TRAVEL Airlines Bus Lines Car Rental Cruises Hotels Travel Agents Trains RESOURCES Class Actions Complaint Form Small Claims Guide Lemon Laws |
CONSUMER NEWS Latest News Automotive Telecom Financial Health Homeowners Scams Seniors Travel More ... RECALLS Automotive Children's Products Drugs Food Household Products Sporting Goods ABOUT US FAQ Privacy Policy Advertise With Us Newsroom Syndication Terms of Use |
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2009 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|