|
|
NEWS
RECALLS
COMPLAINT FORM
SCAM ALERTS
RESOURCES
Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws FAQ Newsletters |
Share |
| Automotive Education Employment Electronics Family Finance Health Homeowners Insurance Pets Shopping Travel |
|
|
|
![]() |
Bank of America Accused of Stonewalling InvestigationExecutives giving investigators the runaround |
|||||||||||||
|
By Mark Huffman
September 9, 2009
Cuomo is investigating whether Bank Of America violated the law when it purchased the failing brokerage firm earlier this year. Cuomo deputy David Markowitz says an investigation has found at least four instances in the fourth quarter of 2008 where Bank of America and its senior officers failed to disclose material non-public information to its shareholders. Markowitz complains that Bank of America has not been fully cooperative in the Attorney General's Office investigation. "We are at the stage in our investigation in which we are making charging decisions with respect to Bank of America and its executives," Markowitz said in a letter to the bank. "However, Bank of America's indiscriminate invocation of the attorney-client privilege is hindering this Office's ability to make fair and fully informed decisions as to what charges, if any, to bring and whether individual Bank of America officers should be charged." Marowitz said investigators cannot accept Bank of America's officers' "naked assertions" that they sought and relied on advice of counsel in good faith, and that, therefore, they should not be charged. Markowitz asked bank executives to reconsider their decision "to prevent this Office from adequately probing these crucial issues." Bank of America is being investigated over four key issues. Among them - that Bank of America was aware of Merrill's ever growing losses but did not share that bit of information with stockholders before shareholders voted to approve the deal. Investigators say Bank of America executives also failed to disclose a $2 billion goodwill writedown in asset value before Bank of America stockholders approved the merger. Report Your Experience
|
|||||||||||||
Back to the top | |
||||||||||||||
Advertisement
|
|
Custom Search
|
||||
|
AUTOMOTIVE Dealers Manufacturers Service Extended Warranties Lemon Laws Recalls Tires Transporters FAMILY Aging Children, Parenting Recalls Dating Education Entertainment Pets Weddings |
FINANCE Annuities Banks Credit Cards Debt Collection Debt Counseling Insurance Investing Loans Mortgages Payday Loans Student Loans Tax Prep HEALTH Doctors Drugs, Pharmacies Health Clubs Hearing Care Hospitals Nursing Homes Nutrition, Diets Vision Care Weight Loss |
HOUSE & HOME Appliances Cookware Furniture Home Improvements Lawn & Garden Movers Pools & Spas Realtors, Rental Agents Recalls Utilities ELECTRONICS Cable TV/DBS Cameras Cell Phones Computers Home Electronics Internet Access Local Phone Service Long Distance VoIP |
SHOPPING In-Home Online Retail Stores Sporting Goods Supermarkets Telemarketers TRAVEL Airlines Bus Lines Car Rental Cruises Hotels Travel Agents Trains RESOURCES Class Actions Complaint Form Small Claims Guide Lemon Laws |
CONSUMER NEWS Latest News Automotive Telecom Financial Health Homeowners Scams Seniors Travel More ... RECALLS Automotive Children's Products Drugs Food Household Products Sporting Goods ABOUT US FAQ Privacy Policy Advertise With Us Newsroom Syndication Terms of Use |
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2009 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|