AT&T Hiking Minimum Fees on Three Phone Services

AT&T • Slamming • Long Distance • Local • Wireless • Broadband • Telemarketers --- News • NY to AT&T: Please Deposit $2.63 Million • AT&T Agrees to Refund Some Ringtone Charges • States Asked to Probe AT&T U-Verse Explosions • AT&T Exits Pay Phone Business • AT&T Changes Contract Policy • AT&T Changes Terms Of Service After Outcry • AT&T Agrees to New Stolen Cell Phone Rules • AT&T Stiffens Language Covering Objectionable Content • AT&T Adds Parental Controls To Mobile Phones • AT&T Slammed Over Rebate Policies • Appeals Court Shreds AT&T Arbitration Clause • Court OKs Rebate Lawsuit against Cingular/AT&T • AT&T Trashes Cingular Brand • AT&T Offers Net Neutrality Concessions To Win Merger Approval • FCC Delays Decision On AT&T/BellSouth Deal • Justice Department Green Lights AT&T-BellSouth Merger • FCC Clears the Way for AT&T-BellSouth Merger • AT&T Trumpets New TV Service • AT&T Web Site Hacked; Customer Data Exposed • AT&T Sues Calling Record Brokers • AT&T Declares Consumers' Personal Data "Corporate Property" • AT&T Plans to Kill Cingular Name • Report: AT&T Acquiring BellSouth • SBC Recast as AT&T • FCC approves AT&T, MCI Deals • Justice Dept. OKs AT&T, MCI Sell-Outs • SBC Will Keep AT&T Name • Consumer Groups Oppose Big Telco Mergers • SBC Buys AT&T • AT&T Will Pay Refunds to New Yorkers • AT&T Will Pull Out of 7 States • AT&T Teams With Sprint to Return to Wireless Business • Minnesota Sues AT&T • Class Action Charges AT&T With Slamming • Another AT&T Rate Hike • AT&T Hiking Minimum Fees • AT&T Faces $780,000 Do-Not-Call Fine • AT&T Will Run Do-Not-Call List • Supreme Court Denies AT&T's Appeal of Arbitration Ruling

January 14, 2004
Consumers will pay more for phone service from the largest U.S. long-distance company. AT&T is marking the 20th year of its divestiture with several hikes in minimum usage requirements.

Subscribers to AT&T's 5¢ eWeekends Plan will be billed a minimum of $5 per month before fees and taxes, starting March 1, 2004. Currently there is no minimum usage requirement on the 5¢ eWeekends service. MCI offers a similar plan called One Net Savings, which has a $6 monthly minimum, according to Rich Sayers, who analyzes phone services for 10-10PhoneRates.com and Phone-bill-alert.com.

"While this AT&T minimum is lower than MCI's, consumers can get better deals with smaller long-distance companies that don't require a minimum billing amount," says Sayers.

Two other AT&T services will have higher minimum usage requirements starting in March. AT&T 5¢ Nights Plan and One Rate 10¢ Plan users will be billed a minimum of $7 before fees and taxes, up from the current $5 minimum. What's more, AT&T long-distance customers who make at least one out-of-state call are hit with another 99¢ AT&T Regulatory Assessment Fee.

"So people are on the hook for at least $8 a month because AT&T doesn't count its fee toward minimum usage," adds Sayers.

This month AT&T added another new fee affecting about 10 million consumers. Subscribers to AT&T's "Basic Rate" plan pay a $3.95 monthly fee starting in January, 2004. AT&T also reduced the rate for weekend state-to-state calls on that Basic Rate plan.

For more details, refer to the consumer alert available online at http://10-10phonerates.com/news/nov_24_2003.html

"This January has been an unusually quiet month in regard to phone rates and fees," notes Sayers. "Watch for moves by MCI and Sprint later in the quarter."

Back to the top |

Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2009 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.    The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission.