CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  
Small Claims Guide   Class Actions   Lemon Laws   FAQ   Newsletters   Spanish


Complain about a product or service

Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

Drugmaker Admits Claritin Kickback Scheme

Pacificare and CIGNA Not Charged in Scam



July 30, 2004
Schering-Plough will pay the federal government and 49 states $282 million to settle a Medicaid fraud case involving its Claritin allergy drug. The company will also plead guilty to criminal charges of violating the Anti-Kickback Statute and pay the federal government a $52 million fine, U.S. Attorney Patrick Meehan said.

Schering-Plough defrauded Medicaid, a health insurance program for the poor administered by the federal government and the states, by failing to report the correct "best" or lowest price for its Claritin allergy drug, as required by law.

The company granted secret discounts on Claritin to two large HMOs, Pacificare and CIGNA, but failed to include the data in calculating the drug's "best" or lowest price. As a result, the best price reported to Medicaid was higher than the true best price, resulting in smaller rebates to the states and the federal government.

Schering-Plough gave Pacificare and CIGNA price breaks on Claritin after the HMOs threatened to drop the allergy medicine for a cheaper drug. The company hid the discounts by providing them to the HMOs in the form of "fees," interest free loans, price breaks on other medications and side agreements.

"Schering-Plough's Claritin con has been exposed and stopped: this drug company proved allergic to lawful, fair business practices – boosting sales of its allergy drug Claritin through a scheme of concealed discounts," Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal said.

"The company defrauded Connecticut, other state and federal taxpayers of hundreds of millions of dollars and now must pay. The company resorted to a cynical subterfuge, creating a complex scheme to deceive federal and state officials. Phony fees, fake agreements, false loans, all were intended to further fatten the company's profits at consumers' ultimate expense. This scheme is enough to make anyone gag and choke."

The U. S. Department of Justice and the National Association of Medicaid Fraud Control Units, an anti-Medicaid fraud coalition of state officials, also took part in the investigation of the scam and resulting settlement.




Consumer News

October 7 2008

Recent Recalls & Safety Alerts



FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F

Sign up now!


Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday

Sign up now!


Knowledge is free.
Knowledge is power.



Back to the top |


Home | Complaint Form | News | Recalls | FAQ |
Consumer Resources | Small Claims Guide | Lemon Law | Newsletter | Contact Us
Advertise With Us | Testimonials | Newsroom | RSS Feeds |


Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.    The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission.