|
|
NEWS
RECALLS
COMPLAINT FORM
SCAM ALERTS
RESOURCES
Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws FAQ Newsletters |
Share |
| Automotive Education Employment Electronics Family Finance Health Homeowners Insurance Pets Shopping Travel |
|
|
|
![]() |
Drugmaker Admits Claritin Kickback SchemePacificare and CIGNA Not Charged in Scam |
|||
|
July 30, 2004
Schering-Plough defrauded Medicaid, a health insurance program for the poor administered by the federal government and the states, by failing to report the correct "best" or lowest price for its Claritin allergy drug, as required by law. The company granted secret discounts on Claritin to two large HMOs, Pacificare and CIGNA, but failed to include the data in calculating the drug's "best" or lowest price. As a result, the best price reported to Medicaid was higher than the true best price, resulting in smaller rebates to the states and the federal government. Schering-Plough gave Pacificare and CIGNA price breaks on Claritin after the HMOs threatened to drop the allergy medicine for a cheaper drug. The company hid the discounts by providing them to the HMOs in the form of "fees," interest free loans, price breaks on other medications and side agreements. "Schering-Plough's Claritin con has been exposed and stopped: this drug company proved allergic to lawful, fair business practices – boosting sales of its allergy drug Claritin through a scheme of concealed discounts," Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal said. "The company defrauded Connecticut, other state and federal taxpayers of hundreds of millions of dollars and now must pay. The company resorted to a cynical subterfuge, creating a complex scheme to deceive federal and state officials. Phony fees, fake agreements, false loans, all were intended to further fatten the company's profits at consumers' ultimate expense. This scheme is enough to make anyone gag and choke." The U. S. Department of Justice and the National Association of Medicaid Fraud Control Units, an anti-Medicaid fraud coalition of state officials, also took part in the investigation of the scam and resulting settlement. |
|||
Back to the top | |
||||
|
|
Custom Search
|
||||
|
AUTOMOTIVE Dealers Manufacturers Service Extended Warranties Lemon Laws Recalls Tires Transporters FAMILY Aging Children, Parenting Recalls Dating Education Entertainment Pets Weddings |
FINANCE Annuities Banks Credit Cards Debt Collection Debt Counseling Insurance Investing Loans Mortgages Payday Loans Student Loans Tax Prep HEALTH Doctors Drugs, Pharmacies Health Clubs Hearing Care Hospitals Nursing Homes Nutrition, Diets Vision Care Weight Loss |
HOUSE & HOME Appliances Cookware Furniture Home Improvements Lawn & Garden Movers Pools & Spas Realtors, Rental Agents Recalls Utilities ELECTRONICS Cable TV/DBS Cameras Cell Phones Computers Home Electronics Internet Access Local Phone Service Long Distance VoIP |
SHOPPING In-Home Online Retail Stores Sporting Goods Supermarkets Telemarketers TRAVEL Airlines Bus Lines Car Rental Cruises Hotels Travel Agents Trains RESOURCES Class Actions Complaint Form Small Claims Guide Lemon Laws |
CONSUMER NEWS Latest News Automotive Telecom Financial Health Homeowners Scams Seniors Travel More ... RECALLS Automotive Children's Products Drugs Food Household Products Sporting Goods ABOUT US FAQ Privacy Policy Advertise With Us Newsroom Syndication Terms of Use |
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2009 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|