Complain about a product or service

California Joins Insurance Crackdown

October 21, 2004
New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer started it, filing suit against Marsh & McLennan for allegedly steering business clients to insurers that paid an extra compensation. Now, California's Insurance Commission, John Garamendi, is putting the insurance industry under tougher scrutiny.

Insurance Probe • Connecticut Files Antitrust Suit Against Reinsurance Broker • The Hartford Settles Illegal Trading Charges • Zurich American Implements Reforms, Pays Consumers Millions • Liberty Mutual Sued in Bid-Rigging Investigation • Insurance Executives Indicted for Bid Rigging, Fraud • Aon Settles For $190 Million • Marsh & McLennan to Pay $850 Million • Universal Life Settles with California • Florida Subpoenas Insurers • Zurich American Insurance Executives Plead Guilty • NY Insurance Broker Charged With Fraud, Antitrust Violations • Fremont Investment Advisors Settle Market Timing Case • Florida Opens Insurance Probe • Oregon Joins Insurance Probe • California Joins Insurance Crackdown • Widespread Insurance Corruption, NY Charges

Calling secret broker commissions a "serious problem that betrays the public's trust," Garamendi has announced new regulations requiring agents and brokers to disclose any financial incentive they would receive for selling certain insurance products and steering business to specific companies.

Targeting a practice that has sparked a national controversy and criminal charges against industry executives, Garamendi said his proposal would help clarify and strengthen the laws prohibiting these practices.

"When consumers place their trust in the hands of agents and brokers to find them the best policy at the best price, they should know if a backroom deal has already been struck," Garamendi said. "My ongoing investigation will expose these under-the-table kickbacks that are not in the best interest of consumers."

The regulations were released this week for public review, after which they must gain the approval of the state's Office of Administrative Law.

Brokers would be required to disclose to their clients whether they were receiving fees from a third party for steering business their way. Also, brokers would not be permitted to put their own financial interests above those of their clients.

Specifically, a broker would be in trouble if he or she:

• Fails to provide the client with the proposal from the best available insurer;
• Advises a client to select an insurer other than a best available insurer;
• Advises a client not to select the best available insurer from among multiple insurers suggested to the client; and
• Fails to take reasonable measures to obtain a quote from an insurer that might be the best available.

Garamendi ordered the drafting of the regulations in March after the practice drew scrutiny from a foundation critical of the incentive commission practice. At that time he also initiated an investigation of the industry in California to assess the extent of this practice, and to determine the need for any ensuing regulatory or legal action.

Under Garamendi's proposed regulations, failure to comply could result in fines of up to $10,000 per incident, issuance of a cease and desist order by the Commissioner, and/or the revocation or suspension of a company or broker's license.

Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.

Back to the top |

Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.    The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission.