Complain about a product or service

Mad Cow Measures Inadequate, Inspectors Charge

December 23, 2004
Public Citizen is joining federal food inspectors in calling for stricter enforcement of Mad Cow (BSE) safety measures in U.S. facilities.

In a letter to Dr. Merle Pierson, acting under secretary for food safety at the USDA, Public Citizen urged the agency to pay closer attention to BSE-related enforcement concerns in meat plants.

The consumer group pointed to a recent letter from the chairman of the National Joint Council of Food Inspection Locals, the union which represents federal government meat inspectors. The NJC letter detailed reports by inspectors that they have limited ability to enforce current BSE-related regulations.

Both letters focus on specific concerns related to specified risk materials (SRMs), the nervous system tissues believed to be most likely to carry the infectious prions that cause BSE.

The USDA's policies regarding the removal of SRMs from human food has been widely promoted by the agency as an important public health protection.

The most serious complaints from inspectors are:

• Plant employees are not correctly identifying and marking all heads and carcasses of animals over 30 months old, resulting in errors in SRM removal down the line. (Many of the rules governing what materials must be removed from human food are dependent on the age of the animal, with 30 months as the dividing line.)

• Inspectors are not authorized to take action in plants producing beef for export when they see plant employees failing to meet the standards required by other governments.

"These reports from government inspectors, whose job it is to prevent unsafe meat from entering the human food supply, are extremely disturbing," the letter notes.

The group called on the agency to instruct government inspectors to examine each head to ensure that plant personnel are correctly determining the age of cattle, and that written instructions are given to inspectors enabling them to take action regarding any violation of export requirements.

Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.

Back to the top |

Home | Complaint Form | News | Recalls | FAQ |
Consumer Resources | Small Claims Guide | Lemon Law | Newsletter | Contact Us
Advertise With Us | Testimonials | Newsroom | RSS Feeds |

Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.    The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission.