|
|
NEWS
RECALLS
COMPLAINT FORM
SCAM ALERTS
RESOURCES
Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws FAQ Newsletters |
Share |
| Automotive Education Employment Electronics Family Finance Health Homeowners Insurance Pets Shopping Travel |
|
|
|
![]() |
NY Furniture Store Abused Military Customers |
||||||||||||||
|
October 8, 2004
New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer reached the settlement with The Junction home furnishings store. He said the store had charged exorbitant interest, bullied its customers and improperly garnished the wages of those who fell behind on their payments. An investigation by Spitzer's Watertown office revealed that special financing provided through The Junction required soldiers to sign "confessions of judgment" admitting that they failed to stay current with their repayment plan even before they began making payments. Under the terms of those financial arrangements -- illegal under federal and state law -- the furniture retailer could commence immediate garnishment of wages with hefty interest charges after a single late payment, which can occur accidentally. Traditionally, businesses take such action only after a formal default on the loan and after consumers have had an opportunity to respond in court. In fact, The Junction had begun the wage garnishment process against 185 consumers for more than $600,000. When Spitzer's investigation began, the company had already garnished wages in excess of at least $23,000. The vast majority of consumers whose wages were garnished by The Junction were soldiers now deployed overseas in combat zones. In one case, The Junction attempted to repossess furniture that had been bought on loan by another soldier who had then sold it to the innocent buyer at a garage sale. In another case, The Junction attempted to repossess furniture from a soldier because the retailer perceived an "anticipatory breach" of his loan. In settling the matter, The Junction agreed to vacate all of the illegally obtained judgments and to: Discontinue financing arrangements that include illegal pre-default confessions of judgment; Spitzer said the case was an example for both businesses and consumers. "Merchants are entitled to collect the debts they are owed. This is especially important for small business operating on tight margins. At the same, companies must be fair to consumers in both credit policies and debt collection practices," Spitzer said. The investigation was begun after military officials contacted Spitzer's office. Report Your Experience
|
||||||||||||||
Back to the top | |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
Custom Search
|
||||
|
AUTOMOTIVE Dealers Manufacturers Service Extended Warranties Lemon Laws Recalls Tires Transporters FAMILY Aging Children, Parenting Recalls Dating Education Entertainment Pets Weddings |
FINANCE Annuities Banks Credit Cards Debt Collection Debt Counseling Insurance Investing Loans Mortgages Payday Loans Student Loans Tax Prep HEALTH Doctors Drugs, Pharmacies Health Clubs Hearing Care Hospitals Nursing Homes Nutrition, Diets Vision Care Weight Loss |
HOUSE & HOME Appliances Cookware Furniture Home Improvements Lawn & Garden Movers Pools & Spas Realtors, Rental Agents Recalls Utilities ELECTRONICS Cable TV/DBS Cameras Cell Phones Computers Home Electronics Internet Access Local Phone Service Long Distance VoIP |
SHOPPING In-Home Online Retail Stores Sporting Goods Supermarkets Telemarketers TRAVEL Airlines Bus Lines Car Rental Cruises Hotels Travel Agents Trains RESOURCES Class Actions Complaint Form Small Claims Guide Lemon Laws |
CONSUMER NEWS Latest News Automotive Telecom Financial Health Homeowners Scams Seniors Travel More ... RECALLS Automotive Children's Products Drugs Food Household Products Sporting Goods ABOUT US FAQ Privacy Policy Advertise With Us Newsroom Syndication Terms of Use |
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2009 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|