Complain about a product or service

Cell Phones Probably Safe, British Study Concludes

• Cancer Center Workers Warned about Cell Phone Risks • New Mexico Allergy Sufferers Want Public Wi-Fi Ban • Study Cautions Pregnant Women On Cell Phone Use • Researcher: Cell Phones 'More Dangerous Than Smoking' • Cell Phones May Provide False Sense Of Security • Study Suggests Cell Phone-Salivary Gland Cancer Link • Scientist Worries WiFi May Harm Children • British Study To Examine Cell Phone-Health Links • Study: Cell Phone Use Not Linked to Cancer Risk • FDA Will Review Cell Phone-Cancer Link • Supreme Court Clears Cell Phone Cancer Suits for Trial • St. Louis Researchers Find Cell Phone Radiation Doesn't Promote Cancer • Swedish Study Finds No Cell Phone-Cancer Link in First Decade of Use • WHO Study Examines Cellphone Risks to Kids • Judges OKs Cell Phone Safety Case • Cell Phones May Harm Sperm Cells, British Study Finds • Swedish Study Finds Cell Phone-Brain Tumor Link • Firefly Promotes Cell Phone for Kids • Researchers: Cell Phones Pose Cancer Risk for Kids • British Lab Will Study Cell Phone Radiation • Swedish Study Finds Higher Risk in Long-Term Users • Cell Phones Probably Safe: British Study • Court Blocks Cell Phone "Ray Blockers" • Cell Phone Radiation Suit Dismissed • Baltimore attorney Peter Angelos enters cell suit • New Orleans judge lets cell-phone suit stand • Report Finds "Legitimate Questions" About Cell Phone Safety • Doctor Blames Cell Phones for His Brain Tumor • Cell Phone Cancer Link • Readers Report Their Problems • Cell Phone Safety: An Editorial

January 16, 2004
A British study finds no evidence that cell phones create any adverse health effects from radio frequency (RF) emissions. But the study notes that there are limitations to the research carried out so far, and mobile phones have only been in widespread use for a relatively short time.

The independent Advisory Group on Non-ionising Radiation (AGNIR) reviewed the evidence for health effects from radiofrequency transmissions, especially that published since the Stewart Report on Mobile Phones and Health in 2000. That report says the biological and epidemiological evidence does not suggest cancer causation from cell phone use.

The report concluded that there is still a possibility that there could be health effects from exposure to radio frequency transmissions below guideline levels, and said continued research is needed.

AGNIR concluded that there is no biological evidence for mutation or tumour causation by RF exposure, and epidemiological studies overall do not support causal associations between exposures to RF and the risk of cancer, in particular from mobile phone use.

A number of studies have suggested possible effects on brain function at RF exposure levels comparable with those from mobile phone handset usage, but AGNIR said it regarded the overall evidence as inconclusive.

Other studies have indicated effects of pulse modulated RF on the movement of calcium ions in cells and tissues of the nervous system. However, AGNIR found that the early results are not supported by recent, better conducted studies.

As for mobile phone base stations, AGNIR said data from a number of surveys confirmed that exposure levels are extremely low and unlikely to pose a health risk.

"The weight of evidence now available does not suggest that there are adverse health effects from exposures to RF fields below guideline levels, but the published research on RF exposures and health has limitations, and mobile phones have only been in widespread use for a relatively short time," the report said.

"The possibility therefore remains open that there could be health effects from exposure to RF fields below guideline levels; hence continued research is needed,” it concluded.

Back to the top |

Home | Complaint Form | News | Recalls | FAQ |
Consumer Resources | Small Claims Guide | Lemon Law | Newsletter | Contact Us
Advertise With Us | Testimonials | Newsroom | RSS Feeds |

Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.    The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission.