|
|
NEWS
RECALLS
COMPLAINT FORM
SCAM ALERTS
RESOURCES
Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws FAQ Newsletters |
Share |
| Automotive Education Employment Electronics Family Finance Health Homeowners Insurance Pets Shopping Travel |
|
Psychic Readers Network |
||||
|
A
13-yr-old from our household and his 13-yr-old friend were home alone
(summer) and saw an ad on TV for a free 3-minute tarot card reading
(900#). They
called, and were put on hold. They
never were asked their ages, and they never received the free reading. After several minutes, someone got on the phone with them and
told them they had won a Nintendo 64 and 5 free games.
Then they were put on hold again while someone "checked the
availability" of the five games the two boys had chosen. When
60 minutes had passed, a mechanical voice interjected and disconnected
them - no reading, no free Nintendo 64, no five free games. Then
the older brother (16 yr old) called the same number back and was
connected through to a pay phone on some street somewhere!
The total bill was $294.41 for the two calls. This
has since been removed from our phone bill and, after getting nowhere
with Access Resource Services -- Psychic Reader's in-house collection
agent -- we have paid a reduced figure of $203.29, so that our credit is
not ruined. Ultimately,
as the adults in the house, we are responsible for the actions of our
children, but our argument is that they were intentionally enticed to
remain holding to get a free game set (geared obviously at young people)
and chalk up the expense! The
boys were never asked their ages or if they had permission to call a 900
#, and they never received verbal confirmation of when charges would
begin accumulating. What
are the laws governing 900#'s, and is there anything that can be done to
make them better/clearer, so that this doesn't happen to another family?
We have taken the precaution of permanently blocking 900 # access
from all house lines. As
I stated above, we basically "ate" it, to protect from credit
ruination. I was able to
negotiate a 30% reduction, because minors were involved, but,
ultimately, misleading advertising and empty promises were to blame for
this mishap. I had to
borrow money to pay this bill - never a pleasant experience. We think the Federal Communications Commission should have banned 900 numbers long ago. They have no redeeming social value and serve mainly as a haven for con artists.
|
|||
Back to the top | |
||||
Advertisement
|
|
Custom Search
|
||||
|
AUTOMOTIVE Dealers Manufacturers Service Extended Warranties Lemon Laws Recalls Tires Transporters FAMILY Aging Children, Parenting Recalls Dating Education Entertainment Pets Weddings |
FINANCE Annuities Banks Credit Cards Debt Collection Debt Counseling Insurance Investing Loans Mortgages Payday Loans Student Loans Tax Prep HEALTH Doctors Drugs, Pharmacies Health Clubs Hearing Care Hospitals Nursing Homes Nutrition, Diets Vision Care Weight Loss |
HOUSE & HOME Appliances Cookware Furniture Home Improvements Lawn & Garden Movers Pools & Spas Realtors, Rental Agents Recalls Utilities ELECTRONICS Cable TV/DBS Cameras Cell Phones Computers Home Electronics Internet Access Local Phone Service Long Distance VoIP |
SHOPPING In-Home Online Retail Stores Sporting Goods Supermarkets Telemarketers TRAVEL Airlines Bus Lines Car Rental Cruises Hotels Travel Agents Trains RESOURCES Class Actions Complaint Form Small Claims Guide Lemon Laws |
CONSUMER NEWS Latest News Automotive Telecom Financial Health Homeowners Scams Seniors Travel More ... RECALLS Automotive Children's Products Drugs Food Household Products Sporting Goods ABOUT US FAQ Privacy Policy Advertise With Us Newsroom Syndication Terms of Use |
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2009 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|